
Shame and Secrecy: Genital Mutilation in the US
Sat Oct 15, 2005 at 12:58:24 AM PDT
Think genital mutilation doesn't happen here?
It does--in each of the fifty states, and in practically every other
western nation in the world on a daily basis. If there is a pediatric
hospital associated with a medical school in your town or city, be
assured that what I am about to tell you is done regularly in your
community.
In the United States alone, it is estimated that five children a day
have their genitals cut without their consent--not including
circumcision. The vast majority of these surgeries are purely cosmetic
and is the only non-medically necessary surgery routinely done on
children before they are one or two years old.
Something to keep in mind as you read this diary and the future
installments are that are two main times when sexual differentiation
takes place. Beyond these two big bangs that take place in our lives,
the effects of our hormones are subtlety shaping us up to be who we are
on a regular basis--even as adults.
This will be the first of a four part series I want to do over the next several weekends if there is interest.
1. Intersex 101--done
2. A short history of sex, gender and how intervention started in the 1950s.
3. What intersex activists are doing
4. How you can help fix this broken part of our small world
It's a big topic--much too big to cover in just one diary. This one
will probably be the longest one, thankfully. I hope you'll take the
time to read it through. It may appear to not be political in nature,
but it is very much so as you will learn if you follow along in future
installments.
The first time is in the womb at about 12-16 weeks. At that point, if
there is a Y chromosome, the fetus starts to masculinize if everything
is going to plan.
If there is no Y chromosome, the fetus continues to feminize and you
have a female, assuming she doesn't inherit a funky gene or develop an
endocrine problem.
Sometimes, the maternal environment and endocrine hormones decide to do
their own thing in the womb and give us babies that are XX but look
like boys and ones that are XY but look like girls at birth. And
sometimes, shit just happens that can't be traced to any one cause.
The other point of sex differentiation is at puberty when the ovaries
or testes kick into high gear and start putting out large amounts of
testosterone or estrogens. Prior to puberty, most people are pretty
much alike hormonally---the differentiations you see are mostly social
with only minor endocrine influences. Girls are put into dresses and
told to act like a girl, boys into jeans and told to act like a boy.
Social cues are used to reinforce to both the child and the outside
world if the child is male or female. Most follow along quite
naturally but for others, what they feel growing inside can be a vastly
different story.
It all comes down to a big bowl of hormones in the womb and with a bit
of luck, everything getting stirred into the right place at the right
time.
Congratulations...you have...a baby
At birth, the sex of the newborn is determined on visual evidence.
That is, those words all parents come to expect to hear shouted out,
"It's a boy" or, "It's a girl", is based upon what is obvious---a penis
is male, a vulva is female. Karotyping is not standard for the vast majority of births. Only if a problem later arises or is obvious at birth, will it be done.
A few parents each day hear something different. They hear words like,
"Oh, shit" as my mother did 4+ decades ago. They may hear nothing as
the baby is quickly removed from the delivery room. They might be
told, "I'm sorry, we don't know". One common thing that happens when
an obviously intersex birth takes place is the new parents will usually
not be offered the opportunity to immediately hold their newborn, even
though there is no medical emergency.
Other parents will hear, "It's a boy", and then be told a few days
later, their baby isn't a boy at all. Or they hear just the opposite,
and find out that all those pink clothes they bought will fit their
baby boy just fine.
These unexpected situations place an immediate burden on the new
parents. Relatives, friends, colleagues, are all waiting to hear
whether the new baby is a boy or girl. And the doctors and nurses
don't have an answer. Little information is being offered by the
hospital because medical protocol doesn't include counseling and social
work assistance for parents of intersex children. Sometimes full
information will be kept from the parents for a few days in an effort
to not distress them too much.
This isn't something that parents are warned about while
expecting---that one in two thousand live births are intersex. The
first exposure for most (unless there is a familial history someone
brought up---which usually doesn't happen due to shame and secrecy)
will be when that baby is born. I'm not being sensational here---this
is very much a reality in American hospitals.
Meanwhile, everyone is asking questions and the new parents are forced
to confront what is male or female without any preparation.
What is it exactly that makes us male or female?
Our chromosomes?
Our genitals?
Our internal reproductive system?
All of the above?
Or, is it our gender which often has no dependency on any of the above and won't be discovered for a couple of years?
What goes wrong?
Sometimes, it is a chromosomal variation that puts someone into the
realm of intersex. In those situations, no one may know for several
years that gender, sex, and chromosomes don't always fall into a neat
binary order. In most cases, it ends up leading to great distress to
the parents if the person is still a child when it is discovered or to
the person him or herself when they discover the secret as adults.
Just like with the intersex births obvious at birth that cause a
questioning of sex, so do the adults who discover the truth about
themselves as an adult--who am I? Am I male or female? Am I really a
product of my chromosomes?
There was a wonderful article in Redbook Magazine a few years back (not
online---but email me if you want a copy) about what happens when the
parents know but never tell the child. The woman in the article
discovered that she was XY when she went back to college and did a
karotype swab during a biology class. The results weren't quite what
she expected.
There are 70+ variations in intersex that can occur and since I'm not a
doctor, don't play one on the internet, and didn't sleep in a Holiday
Inn Express last night, I can't get into medical and variation
specifics about each type of intersex out there but will attempt a
quick overview.
The Not So Obvious
Briefly, on the chromosome side, you can have XXY, XXXY (mosaic--every
cell in the body is different), XXO, XXXY, XYYY, XXYO. Many different
results occur with chromosome variations and there is no way to
illustrate them all short of a medical textbook. I know there are some
here that fall into these categories and it would be best if they
explained the hormones they take and why, if they so choose.
You can have female looking and female gendered people with XY genes and vice versa.
Some of the chromosome conditions cause genital differences, and some don't.
The Obvious
The newborn visual identification of male or female uses a very basic measurement.
A "standard-sized" clitoris is less than .9 cm at birth.
A `standard-sized" penis is longer than 2.5 cm stretched at birth.
Anyone born with a clitoris or penis that falls outside of these medically defined standards is subject to `intervention'.
If that happens, further tests will be done to determine the
reproductive capabilities as a guide in how to proceed next. Another
factor involves social issues as you will see.
How many people are we talking about?
A conservative estimate is one out of every 2000 infants is born intersex. That is, they have chromosomes and/or genital and/or
reproductive variations that differ from what is considered medically
standard male or female. Some estimates put the incidence of intersex
births as high as one in every couple hundred births and others put it
somewhere around one in every five thousand births.
Can it be `fixed'?
If the person has ovaries and a uterus, the doctors will usually go
with female and simply do what is called "genital restoration or
reconstruction" (I've tried to figure out for years what the hell is
being restored/reconstructed but can't get my head around it)
If a person has testicular tissue that won't function as it should,
they often go with female and surgically remove the testicular tissue.
We normally call this castration but with intersex kids, it's called
"genital reconstruction"
In some cases (such as with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome) the
testicular tissue should probably be removed at some before childhood
if the child is identifying in as female due to the risk of unexpected
virilization)
A boy born without a penis or with a very small one (less than 2.5cms
stretched at birth) will sometimes be surgically sex-reassigned as
female on the assumption that he will never feel like a real man
without a penis big enough for heterosexual, penetrative intercourse.
He may even have had functioning testes before surgery was performed.
A well-known surgeon (Gearhart) remarked while giving a plenary speech
a number of years back, "It is easier to dig a hole than it is to build
a pole".
Medical technology has yet to provide a way to surgically create a
penis in an infant that will grow with his body but advances are being
made.
Dr. William Reiner, a researcher with both a doctorate in pediatric
urology and psychology at Oklahoma State University has been studying
kids who were surgically reassigned female as infants and has written a
number of papers. His research has indicated a good number of these
children reclaim their male identity, usually during puberty. If you
google him, you find even more stuff about his work than I could
possibly post.
And what should we do with the XX girls?
In a girl with a uterus and ovaries, a `large clitoris' is usually reduced in size with surgery.
Up until the late 80's, full clitorectomies were routine however, the
surgeons who do these surgeries (pediatric urologists) claim to have
refined their "technique". It's a Catch-22 however. They do the
clitoral surgeries on infants and there is no way to follow up until
she becomes an adult. By then, any studies are meaningless because
`technique' has changed again.
Common practice these days removes the erectile tissue while leaving
the tip connected to the nerve bundle (even though there is no precise
research out there yet showing just how extensive that nerve bundle
is--the research there is available shows how far into the body the
clitoris nerves go, but nothing yet on the actual physiology of the
external part of the clitoris itself) and then sewing the tip back onto
the small bit of nerves left and calling it a `restored clitoris'.
Here's a picture to better illustrate what I am talking about (sensitive ones---close your eyes and scroll down a bit)

To put this into perspective for unaffected men, it would be like
removing all of your erectile tissue from your penis and then sewing
the tip of your penis back onto the base of it.
This is almost always cosmetic surgery. There are very rare occasions
where there are genital obstructions and those can be life-threatening;
however, even those cases, fixing the medical problem will include
`cosmetic restoration' since the baby is already under anesthesia.
The main reasons for this cosmetic surgery are truly social---the
commonly held medical belief is she will be a lesbian without surgery,
she will have gender issues, no man will accept her as she is, she'll
be teased in school, and she'll never want to partake in sports.
Little thought is given to what the girl may want when she grows
up---her clitoris is literally out of her hands by this time (no pun
intended) and what is done is done because there is no surgery to undo
it.
Many women who had this done report being in-orgasmic, uninterested in
sex, have relationship problems, and incontinent. XX women with born
with a large clitoris, regardless of surgical status, report as lesbian
or bisexual more than their unaffected sisters do. A larger percentage
has transitioned to male, regardless of surgical status, compared to
their unaffected sisters and the unaffected population.
Other genital mutilations that take place in modern hospitals include
surgeries to insure a boy can stand to pee. After all, a real boy/man
doesn't sit to pee, does he?
Hypospadius is a common condition that affects boys where the hole on
the penis comes out somewhere on the penis other than the tip. It
might be mild---near the tip, or it might be more severe and come out
near the base. Sometimes there are many holes. Many males with
hypospadius undergo several surgeries in an attempt to fix it with the
most common reason being so they can stand to pee. After awhile, the
number of those surgeries and the resulting scar tissue gives the
person a penis that hurts like hell when it is erect or has little
feeling in it.
A few years ago I did a debate panel with one of the doctors that is
famous for these surgeries and practically fell out of my chair when he
confirmed to me upon questioning that the main reason is so they can
stand to pee! Can you imagine your otherwise functioning penis being
sacrificed to numerous surgeries (each one leaving scar tissue) so you
can stand to pee?!
One common thread in these surgeries is stunning not in the brutality, but in the secrecy.
Many of those that had surgeries like I describe above are never told about them.
Current medical reasoning pushes these surgeries during infancy on the
assumption the person will never remember. It implies that the person
will never be told and will never realize what occurred, if they are
lucky.
For some reason, the American Pediatric Assc doesn't seem to get that
the child will remember the genital exams, will eventually recognize
the scars, and may one day be prompted to request their medical
records.
I found out my own history when I was 35 and I got those medical records.
I stopped reading them when I hit page two and it said, "The clitoris
was amputated to the nub". It was several months before I picked them
up again. Even now, years after reading those words on that yellowed
paper, years after talking to my mom about before she died with all the
knowledge I was unable to drag out from her, I damn near have a mental
breakdown typing them--not because it happened but because there was a
unified front to keep that truth from me while I went through all the
other shit we all go through growing up and becoming sexual human
beings.
Even now 2005, whether or not to disclose a medical diagnosis to the
person affected is still being debated; thankfully, the proponents of
lying and secrecy are quickly losing to the voices in favor of full
disclosure.
Words Can Hurt
I can't end this diary without a note about language:
Many times you will hear people talk about hermaphrodites. Get that
word out of your head right now before you are tempted to use it.
It's misleading and based upon the Greek myth of Hermaphroditus. Humans
do not have both female and male sex organs. It's biologically
impossible.
Ovaries and testes come from the same tissue, the clitoris and penis comes from the same tissue and so on.
Humans can be born with a mixture of both male and female tissue...that
is, may have some testicular tissue on one side of their abdomen and
ovarian tissue on the other, may have an ambiguous mixture of female
and male genitals, and may have a mix of male and female chromosomes.
In the situation of someone with XXYY chromosomes, the medical
diagnosis is "true hermaphroditism" but it doesn't mean two full sets
of genitals on a person able to reproduce themselves.
Just don't use hermaphrodite---we are neither snails nor worms and for
many, it's analogous to the N word. We may use it privately amongst
ourselves or to make a point (i.e. Hermaphrodites with Attitude) but it
is generally frowned upon and considered a slur.
The commonly accepted language is currently intersex.
Some people in the population hate that word too, though. I heard
DSD---"Disorders of Sexual Differentiation" recently at the American
Psychological Conference where I did a presentation. That description
kind of sucks too...disordered? What the fuck? So, yeah...our language
is still being worked out.
Ditto for intersexual. Beyond the creepiness of it, it is stigmatizing and a misleading label.
Most people with intersex identify in the binary---male or female or as
an intersex person who identifies as male (or female) and some identify
just as intersex. If you are not sure, just ask.
Time Magazine did a big article in March, 2005 which called those with
intersex "intersexuals". The community was in an uproar over it. I
was pissed because I had spent hours with the reporter talking about
language and it became obvious she wasn't paying attention. To make
matters worse, I sourced the entire article for her and she didn't even
mention our website!
Intersexuality is an equally bad word. It's not a behavior.
Suggestions include intersexed, intersexed person, or a person with
intersex if there is a compelling reason to make note of it.
i.e.: Janet is an intersexed person. Janet is intersexed and
identifies as female. Janet is a woman with an intersex condition
(preferred by most in my experience).
Resources to learn more:
NY Times article on intersex
Radio Times interview about intersex Search for intersex to find the interview (60 minutes).
Bodies Like Ours-mostly peer support for intersex but lots of good information too
Wikipedia
Genital development in fetuses
Not online but worthwhile to hunt down:
In the Life: American Gender "Size Matters"(in reruns occasionally on your local PBS station unless they are one that censored it because I say clitoris and penis in it)
Tags:
sex,
LGBT,
Bill Reiner,
genital mutilation,
gender (
all tags)